Nature Blogger logoNature Blogger

Campylodoniscus

Campylodoniscus is a genus of titanosaur sauropod dinosaur that lived in what is now Argentina during the Late Cretaceous Period. Its name, meaning 'bent tooth', refers to its distinctive dentition. The genus is known from limited fossil evidence, primarily a single jaw bone.

Key Facts

  • Campylodoniscus was a titanosaur sauropod dinosaur.
  • It lived during the Late Cretaceous Period, specifically the Cenomanian stage (approximately 95 million years ago).
  • Fossils were discovered in Argentina, specifically within the Bajo Barreal Formation.
  • The genus is known from a single maxilla (upper jaw bone) containing seven teeth.
  • Its scientific name means 'bent tooth', derived from Greek.
  • Some researchers consider Campylodoniscus a nomen dubium (doubtful name) due to the limited fossil material.
Campylodoniscus
Scientific Name
Campylodoniscus
Physical Characteristics
  • Possessed curved or bent teeth.
  • Estimated to be around twenty meters in length.
Estimated Length M
20
Dinosaur Group
Titanosauria
Temporal Range
Cenomanian
Named By
Friedrich von Huene
Year Named
1929
Etymology
The genus name 'Campylodoniscus' is derived from the Greek words 'kampylos' (bent or curved) and 'odon' (tooth), with the diminutive suffix '-iscus' added by H. Haubold and O. Kuhn. The original species name, 'ameghinoi', honored Florentino Ameghino.
Fossil Record Quality
Fragmentary
Geographic Distribution

Argentina

About Campylodoniscus

Campylodoniscus is a genus of sauropod dinosaur that roamed the Earth during the Late Cretaceous Period. Specifically, it lived in what is now Argentina during the Cenomanian stage, approximately 95 million years ago. As a member of the titanosaur group, Campylodoniscus was likely a large, long-necked herbivore.

Naming and Classification

The genus was first described by Friedrich von Huene in 1929 as Campylodon ameghinoi. The genus name, meaning 'bent tooth' from Greek, refers to the distinctive shape of its dentition. The specific epithet honored Florentino Ameghino. Later, in 1961, H. Haubold and O. Kuhn renamed the genus to Campylodoniscus, a diminutive form, because the original name was already in use for a fish.

Fossil Evidence

The fossil remains attributed to Campylodoniscus are scarce, consisting of a single jaw bone, the maxilla, which was found to hold seven teeth. This limited evidence has led some paleontologists to consider Campylodoniscus a nomen dubium (doubtful name), as its distinctiveness is difficult to establish definitively from such sparse material.

Physical Characteristics and Habitat

Based on its classification as a titanosaur, Campylodoniscus is estimated to have been around twenty meters in length. While its exact habitat is not detailed in available records, dinosaurs from the Bajo Barreal Formation, where its fossils were found, likely inhabited a diverse Late Cretaceous environment in South America.

Source: Wikipedia ↗

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the name Campylodoniscus mean?

The name Campylodoniscus means 'bent tooth'. It is derived from the Greek words 'kampylos' (bent or curved) and 'odon' (tooth), referring to the shape of its teeth.

When did Campylodoniscus live?

Campylodoniscus lived during the Late Cretaceous Period, specifically in the Cenomanian stage, which was approximately 95 million years ago.

Where were the fossils of Campylodoniscus found?

The fossil remains of Campylodoniscus were discovered in Argentina, within an area known as the Bajo Barreal Formation.

What type of dinosaur was Campylodoniscus?

Campylodoniscus was a sauropod dinosaur, belonging to the titanosaur group. Titanosaurs were a diverse group of long-necked, herbivorous dinosaurs.

How complete is the fossil record for Campylodoniscus?

The fossil record for Campylodoniscus is very limited. It is known primarily from a single jaw bone, the maxilla, which contained seven teeth.

Is Campylodoniscus a valid dinosaur genus?

Some researchers consider Campylodoniscus to be a nomen dubium, meaning a 'doubtful name'. This is due to the scarcity of fossil evidence, making its distinctiveness difficult to confirm.